The Lake Arrowhead Crisis: The Untold Story

By P. L. A. N. -- An Environmental Corporation

UNTOLD STORYSOLUTIONSHISTORYDOCUMENTSNEWSLETTERS

purelake1.JPG

THIS!
Keep the Dream
A Pure and Full Lake

OrchardBay.jpg

NOT THIS!

INTRODUCTION:

My name is Ted Heyck. I am an attorney and a resident/home owner in Arrowhead Woods at Lake Arrowhead. I am employed as a Deputy City Attorney for the City of Los Angeles. My duties there are to defend the City of Los Angeles in civil litigation.

As of 2005, the Greater Lake Arrowhead community and environs uses about 2800-acre feet of water a year. That is a considerable drop from 3600-acre feet at its peak in 2002 and is due to unprecedented recent conservation efforts.

However, that will not be enoght. Even with the temporary full lake due to recent unusual rains, a water deficit still exists in Lake Arrowhead.

The fact is that the Lake at Lake Arrowhead was built to provide water to service up to 3800 homes. The lake now services 7600 homes.

A temporary rainfall, which has filled the lake, now masks this problem.

This website has been dedicated to informing the public about this over drafting and urging responsible actions by everyone to meet the demand. We must derive a responsible and lasting program of supplemental water sources combined with the maximum reasonable conservation. Given the fact that wells, at best, provide a minimal back up source and that state water is not currently available at a reasonable cost, the responsible use of recycled water and conservation must be encouraged.

Some Influential Development interests rather than responsibly searching for water solutions to match their need for growth continue to foster falsehoods about growth as well as deter responsible actions to offset it.

This website is being offered to encourage part timers, full timers, developers and residential owners, to work together to demand responsible conservation, the establishment of recycled water for irrigation to the major landscape water users as well as a commitment to meaningful "planned growth" from our officials. Only then will we protect the DREAM that was and is Lake Arrowhead.

Protect Lake Arrowhead Now (P.L.A.N.) a public benefit corporation, was formed to promote that objective. You can check it out at

Website for P.L.A.N. Recent History:

During the summer of 2002 others and I became increasingly aware that Lake Arrowhead was subsiding at an alarming rate. Docks were detached and many were aground.

A quiet previously ignored and little known public entity, the Lake Arrowhead Community Services District, the local Water and Service Service, was running wild, withdrawing water from the lake and selling the water to whomever asked and in whatever quantity demanded. Its manager and five directors usually met quietly in an ill attended board meeting twice a month. Their mind set was that they were in the water sales business and the lake was limitless. Or so they thought.

By custom the only persons who attended their board meetigs were a myriad of persons who, for one reason or another, sought special dispensations from this local cash cow. It's water budget ten years previously had been one million dollars annually and by 2002 had grown in excess of 2 million.

In the last three years that budget has now grown to 12 million for the water alone--and still growing).

Few people oversaw this sleepy public entity. In early 2002, part timers who dominated local ownership could not have cared less and full timers were not about to spend their time listening to reports on sewer repairs.

For years a boardroom seating twenty plus the board of five, a general manager and some staff had sufficed.

Notices of meetings were simply scotched taped to a window in a forest. No records of meeting were kept in detail. The barest of minutes were maintained.

However, with the lake subsiding at an alarming rate, this five-member board stumbled upon the truth. As part of a five year review commissioned a study on its water supply.

And it was appalled to learn that the local folklore about the temporary drought was simply that. Folklore.

Water Inc informed it that it was over drafting the lake by 100% and it had NOTHING to do with a drought.

Before firing Water, Inc (as part of a knee jerk reaction of shooting the messenger), the Board met and considered how to handle this over use. Development interests were not about to cease development or even admit that the Board had over estimated the lake for the last forty years.

It was decided that the best way to handle the problem while searching for a solution was merely to announce a temporary need to deter use; it would announce a rate increase.

The problem was that LACSD had publicly maintained that there was only a temporary drought problem. Bucking the national news reports that this was the beginning of a twenty-year drought (part of the longer global warming), local interests had denied both global warming and the extension of a twenty-year drought.

The word from the local Chamber of Commerce was that no bad news could issue forth lest it deter business.

However, the residential community was appalled. The commercial community was also concerned, but not as much, since it enjoyed, unknown to most, lower rates than the private domestic sector.

The question loomed, if this was only a temporary problem, why raise rates? After all, it was going to rain in 2003 and fill the lake. Everyone had told the public that.

I attended that meeting and it was clear to many that more was afoot. The numbers did not add up.

However, soon to be learned by others and me the LACSD Board wished to keep the over draft a secret to the press while it solved the problem. The fact was that there was no way to quietly solve the problem.

And Special Interests which dominated the Board were not about to initiate planned growth; and the County Club, which was the major user of lake water to water its grounds for 537 members at an undisclosed discount of 90% was not about to give up its special deal nor curtail its use or, has been later seen, accept recycled water.

But all of this was unknown to most.

One thing was sure: the sleepy Water Company that had been short sightedly run by Special Interests was going to be examined by its constituents. It was going to be thrust into the limelight.

I personally set out to find out the truth and inform the public.

Soon thereafter when the Board refused to recognize the need to conserve, a complaint was filed with the State. A year later the attorneys for the State Water Resources Control Board issued a preliminary opinion denying LACSD the right to withdraw any water whatsoever. They invited briefs and a final opinion is pending. In the meantime a fire was lit under LACSD to move quickly to conserve and find alternate water.

Enormous progress has been made since 2002 to clean up the overuse.

Previously unpublished and unattended Board meetings whose notices consisted of a piece of paper on a window in forest, now are publicized on a new website and recorded by video which is streamed to the public. The District with the free distribution of 1000 low flow toilets initiated a conservation effort. The former general manager was replaced with a new manager who swore to tackle the problems and eliminate the overdraft.

However, this has not been without great and acrimonious controversy and grave dangers.

Development Interests and LACSD are now irresponsibly pushing for putting recycled water into the lake even though a recent state report has revealed that process is still unproven, and dangerous to human health.

The process fails to eliminate pharmaceuticals and pathogens whose long-term effects are unknown.

You may access that report (Water Recycling 2030) by going to a link at the bottom of this page. You also may obtain a copy from

The Department of Water
P.O. Box 94236-0001
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.653.1097

THE NEED FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

To our benefit, many part timers and full timers are now aware of the problems and actively seeking long term solutions.

However, contemporaneously there is enormous pressure being place on locals by the county down hill developers to build in the area. County "planners" have decided to enlarge this area by a 100% population growth in the next twenty years. Patently inadequate and false plans are being promoted that acknowledge some infrastructure problems with a hope that they will be worked out. Roads that collapse under today's traffic and inadequate evacuation routes are simply ignored.


Rather than responsibly working to obtain a greater allotment of state water for the area, which would relieve the pressure to use Lake Arrowhead, either directly or indirectly, these development interests merely seek to build today and leave the inhabitants to worry tomorrow.

Many refuse to give up the old illusions of an infinite lake resource.

And others, in tow with the county profiteering, and seeking to irresponsibly insure local profits nearsightedly have fought hard not to change their old ways "use today, worry tomorrow" ways and still insist upon shooting this messenger.

This site is being maintained to educate people on the tensions involved in the development of this area and to encourage persons to acknowledge that

"Only a fool would throw a party and not provide for food."

Unfortunately, many here at the lake continue to do just that.


This is a volunteer effort and unfortunately this site and the correlative publicity efforts cost money. If you support this effort, take the time to read and think about this information.

If you want to help us financially, you can do so, and we will be forever grateful.

We are up against millions of dollars of adverse development dollars; and all we seek to do is publish the truth and encourage fair, informed and independent management of the local Water Company; and "planned development" instead of unbridled development.


Every bit helps. Should you choose to help us financially, you can make a donation at the P.L.A.N. site noted above through a credit card by clicking on the icon below. The State and Federal government requires P.L.A.N. to report each donors "occupation" ("retired", if appropriate, will do) Otherwise we can still use the donatin but not for political efforts. Without an "occupation" reported, the funds still can be used, but they will be limited to conservation efforts)
+++++

Just below this paragraph you will find a series of links. One of them will take you to the DWR Task Force Report on Recycled Water. Although it contains many different source comments, it simply concludes that Recycled Water for irrigation is excellent, however, at the current level of science, recycled water for drinking is unsafe. Currently science is not able to remove pharmaceuticals and pathogens.

To find this information go to Section 4 of the report, page 50 et seq. Also read the summary which concludes irrigation yes, drinking no, at this time.

A copy of the State Water Resources Control Board preliminary opinion holding that LACSD has no authority to withdraw any water from the lake is also attached.

QUICK AND EASY SECURE CREDIT CARD DONATION TO SUPPORT THIS EFFORT

DWR Recycled Water Task Force Report

The SWRCB Legal Staff Recommendation

A Brief Explanation of Water Rights

Express Your Opinion to the LACSD Board of Directors and Management

Historical Review of Lake Levels Courtesy of ALA

composit.GIF

The Lake Arrowhead Country Club has had a special deal with LACSD since 1978, due to special interest involvement on the Board of LACSD.

537 wealthy patrons, including one current Board member, have enjoyed a 90% discount below the rates paid by other domestic users.

The ludicrous fact is that for a payment of $70 per month from each member, the club could pay regular rates.

Although economic in its water use compared to most golf courses, it splashes in abundant water at a discount that was originally intended to subsidize its existence to attract upscale residences at the Lake. A perk that has outlived its time the club should be required to pay regular rates. State law mandates that that golf clubs convert to use recycled water once that water is provided at the club's property line. Conversion costs are customarily born by the clubs.

Ironically, LACSD, still dominated by special interests, has agreed to provide not just ordinary recycled water to the club, but super refined recycled water so as not to distress them.

However, LACSD still not only refuses to charge it normal rates (under the guise of honoring an illegal contract), but also is spending $13,000,000 to provide this super refined recycled water to the club along with $850,000 of rate payers' money install an additional recycled water sprinkler system for the club in hopes that it might agree to take recycled water being offered to it.